Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1922No. 5574PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Frank A. Youmans, Judge. Bill by United States to cancel an allotment to Barney Tholocco, in which the Black Panther Oil & Gas Company and others became interested. From an order denying him the right to intervene as guardian of Martha Jackson, W. E. McKinney appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is McKinney’s appeal brought from an order denying him the right to intervene in the pending cause as guardian of Martha Jackson, a full blood Creek Indian. The litigation to which he sought to become a party in his claimed representative capacity was of long standing, and had its inception in a bill brought by the United States to cancel an allotment made by the Dawes Commission to Barney Tholocco, a citizen by blood of the Creek Tribe. See United States v. Bessie Wildcat et al., 244 U. S. 111, 37 Sup. Ct. 561, 61 L. Ed. 1024. That suit was begun on November 1,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. RichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. WildcatSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Parmenter v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. United States v. HinkleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Owens v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Swift v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Swift v. ParmenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Cully v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API