New Oakmont Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
In its Personal Holding Company tax return for the year 1937 the plaintiff, in computing its adjusted net income, deducted $52,324.38 as additional income tax paid by it in 1937 for the year 1933. It was admittedly entitled to make this deduction, unless the $52,324.38 was a payment of the kind of taxes imposed by Section 104 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A.Int. Rev.Acts, page 508, such taxes being in the nature of a penalty imposed on a corporation for permitting itself to be used to accumulate gains for its stockholders which, not being distributed to the stockholders,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Appeal of First National Bank of St. LouisUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Zisblatt Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kennecott Copper Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Robertson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
- Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Wayne Hugh Easley Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Wayne Hugh Easley Trust v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.