Legal Opinion

New Oakmont Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 7, 1949No. 46275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

In its Personal Holding Company tax return for the year 1937 the plaintiff, in computing its adjusted net income, deducted $52,324.38 as additional income tax paid by it in 1937 for the year 1933. It was admittedly entitled to make this deduction, unless the $52,324.38 was a payment of the kind of taxes imposed by Section 104 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A.Int. Rev.Acts, page 508, such taxes being in the nature of a penalty imposed on a corporation for permitting itself to be used to accumulate gains for its stockholders which, not being distributed to the stockholders,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Appeal of First National Bank of St. LouisUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Zisblatt Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kennecott Copper Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Robertson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  3. Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. Wayne Hugh Easley Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  5. Wayne Hugh Easley Trust v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API