Legal Opinion

Barnes v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Respondent, United States of America, excepts to the libel on the ground that the court is without jurisdiction since libellant is not a resident of this district and the ship on which the deceased seaman was injured was not in this jurisdiction at the time the libel was filed. The libel is brought under the Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S. C.A. § 741 et seq.

At the outset, libellant raises the point that the respondent is in default in the service of its answer and that by reason thereof the court may not consider its exceptions. It is unnecessary to pass upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Carroll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. McGhee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Sawyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James Battaglia, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Warren v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  3. Rodinciuc v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  5. James Battaglia, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API