Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Dunkley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1978No. 44429PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This interstate child custody dispute raises the usual conflict of laws questions, along with the usual conflicts in the collective judicial mind. Our conflicts resolved, we determine that California remains the appropriate forum to hear this claim for modification of the custody decree which was entered in favor of Mrs. Dunkley (mother) by the Riverside County Superior Court.

The trial court dismissed Mr. Dunkley's (father's) modification action, declining jurisdiction on the basis of domicile, full faith and credit, and forum non conveniens. The Court of Appeals, Division Three, reversed and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mullins v. MullinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rankin v. FerriterWashington Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alcoa Steamship Co. v. M/V Nordic RegentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. v. M/V Nordic RegentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Paolino v. PaolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Matter of Marriage of GreenlawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the Marriage of VerbinWashington Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API