Hygrade Food Products v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
In this appeal, Hygrade Food Products (Petitioner) seeks reversal of a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision that Doris Royster (Claimant) was permanently disabled as a result of injuries sustained while employed by Petitioner. We affirm.
Claimant was employed as a hot dog selector by the Petitioner. Her duties involved observation of the hot dogs as they passed before her on a moving conveyor belt, removing those hot dogs of unsuitable quality and replacing them with acceptable hot dogs. On February 4, 1974,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- LoRubbio v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pastorius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Pennwalt, Stokes Division v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Sansom v. Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- JAB Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.