Legal Opinion

Hygrade Food Products v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1981No. Appeal, No. 3040 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

In this appeal, Hygrade Food Products (Petitioner) seeks reversal of a decision by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision that Doris Royster (Claimant) was permanently disabled as a result of injuries sustained while employed by Petitioner. We affirm.

Claimant was employed as a hot dog selector by the Petitioner. Her duties involved observation of the hot dogs as they passed before her on a moving conveyor belt, removing those hot dogs of unsuitable quality and replacing them with acceptable hot dogs. On February 4, 1974,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. LoRubbio v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Pastorius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Pennwalt, Stokes Division v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Iacono v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Sansom v. Workers' Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. JAB Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API