Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. P & D Coal Mining Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1966No. 16349Published

1DissentPhillips, Circuit Judge

This case involves the construction of a “maximum-minimum” contract for the purchase and sale of not less than ten thousand nor more than fifty thousand tons of coal.

An excellent description of this type of contract appears in Taggert v. Brimfield, 281 F. 830, 831 (C.A. 3, 1922):

“Contracts of this general type are common, where a manufacturer has to provide in advance for a supply of some needed material, the exact amount of which he cannot then specify. In this uncertainty, he names a minimum, which on his part he positively agrees to take, and he names a maximum up to, but not beyond, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Tillson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API