Legal Opinion

Bridewell v. City of Dayton ex rel. Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 22, 1988No. 88-CA-90-SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, judge.

This is a condemnation action filed on March 6, 1987, by the city of Dayton, Ken*152tucky, on behalf of that city’s Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency (hereinafter Urban Renewal) to acquire real estate belonging to the appellants, Thomas and Juanita Bridewell. The property was valued by the appointed commissioners at $12,500. The appellants initially challenged the city’s right to condemn the properly but, in an amended answer, took exception to only the award made by the commissioners. An interlocutory order was entered on June 23, 1987, entitling Urban Renewal to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Searock, D/B/A Allied Marine v. Greg Stripling, Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Amf Inc., D/B/A Hatteras Yachts and Aetna Insurance Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Ready v. JamisonKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Crossley v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Nowicke v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RT Vanderbilt Co., Inc. v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API