Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Thompson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1930No. 44PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

Pursuant to an Act of March 1, 1912, 1 authorizing and directing them so to do, the Commissioners of the District of Columbia instituted in the Supreme Court of the District, under and in accordance with the District Code of Law, a proceeding in rem to condemn the land necessary to extend Lamont Street, northwest, with a width of ninety feet, through two designated squares west of its termination at 19th Street. 2 The strip of land necessary for this extension was condemned and title vested in the District, and the damages were awarded and the benefits assessed by a verdict of the jury. This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Bradford v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Valentine v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. McConville v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lupe Alonzo, Jim Alonzo, Joe Alonzo and Valentino Alonzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  4. Webster County Soil Conservation District v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Woodruff v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API