Legal Opinion

Local Union No. 135 v. Merchandise Warehouse Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1956No. 18,728Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Bowen, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. The majority opinion recognizes that “a union’s attempt to organize a group of employees and the unwillingness of such employees to be organized constitutes a labor dispute” within the meaning of the Anti-Injunction Act, §40-501, et seq. Burns’ 1952 Replacement. By the definition of terms contained in such Act, §40-513, Burns’ 1952 Replacement, it is stated:

“The term ‘labor dispute’ includes any controversy concerning any terms or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or repre*68sentation of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API