Local Union No. 135 v. Merchandise Warehouse Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Bowen, J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. The majority opinion recognizes that “a union’s attempt to organize a group of employees and the unwillingness of such employees to be organized constitutes a labor dispute” within the meaning of the Anti-Injunction Act, §40-501, et seq. Burns’ 1952 Replacement. By the definition of terms contained in such Act, §40-513, Burns’ 1952 Replacement, it is stated:
“The term ‘labor dispute’ includes any controversy concerning any terms or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or repre*68sentation of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.