Peizer v. Bergeon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By SKEEL, J.
This appeal comes to this court on questions of law from a judgment entered for the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of Cleveland. The action is one based on a cognovit note. The judgment entered by confession on the cognovit feature of the note was vacated upon motion, an answer was filed by the defendants-appellants and trial proceeded on the issues made by the pleadings. From the judgment entered for the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, the defendants claim the following errors:
“1. The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the Court is against the manifest weight…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Petterson v. PattbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Kolb v. J. E. Bennett Land Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1896
- William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United Steel Workers of America, Local No. 1330 v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980