Legal Opinion

Peizer v. Bergeon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1960No. 25001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.

This appeal comes to this court on questions of law from a judgment entered for the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of Cleveland. The action is one based on a cognovit note. The judgment entered by confession on the cognovit feature of the note was vacated upon motion, an answer was filed by the defendants-appellants and trial proceeded on the issues made by the pleadings. From the judgment entered for the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, the defendants claim the following errors:

“1. The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the Court is against the manifest weight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stensgaard v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Petterson v. PattbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Kolb v. J. E. Bennett Land Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  5. William Weisman Realty Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Steel Workers of America, Local No. 1330 v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API