Legal Opinion · Dissent

Durant v. State Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1986No. Docket Nos. 72895, 73245. (Calendar Nos. 2, 3)Published

1DissentWilliams, C.J.

I respectfully dissent. I do not here challenge the majority’s conclusion regarding the so-called Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25-34, although I cannot fully agree with their analysis. Rather, I write separately to challenge the majority’s explication, or lack of explication, of Const 1963, art 8, § 2, the pertinent provisions of the School Code of 1976, MCL 380.1 et seq.; MSA 15.4001 et seq., and the school aid formula, MCL 388.1621; MSA 15.1919(921).

Const 1963, art 8, § 2, provides in part:

The legislature shall maintain and support a *397system of free public elementary and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. MacQueen v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Governor v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kosa v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API