Legal Opinion

Coffin v. Coffin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The authority of the court to allow the amendment in question cannot be doubted. The parties were in court, and the finding of the court indicated that justice required such an amendment. Jellison v. Jellison, 70 N. H. 633; Sanborn v. Railroad, 76 N. H. 65. In fact the libelee does not deny the right of the court to permit the amendment. But his complaint is that he was not given a further hearing after the amendment was allowed. Whether this privilege should be granted to the libelee is a question of fact to be determined by the trial court. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417, and cases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lacoss v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  2. Sanborn v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  3. Jellison v. JellisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hussey v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API