Legal Opinion

Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. I v. Quick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1928No. 8075. [fn*]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This cause, like that of Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Gannaway, this day decided, 13 S. W. (2d) 294, concerns somewhat the status, duties, liabilities, and exemptions, if any, of water improvement and control districts, provided for in section 59, art. 16, of the state Constitution, and chapter 2, title 128, R. S. 1925. The facts in the two cases differ widely in some aspects, however.

In this case appellee alleges that appellant’s manager contracted in behalf of the district to irrigate appellee’s cotton crop at a particular time in the future, on a specific…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Straub v. CappsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. ParkhurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API