Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Illinois Circuit Court

Decided November 10, 1893Published

Bill for a mandatory injunction. Heard before Judge Oliver H. Horton.

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

(orally)':—

I have not prepared a written opinion in this case. While I have examined many of your authorities, I have not felt it necessary to review all these authorities in a written opinion. What I have to say, therefore, is more in the nature of my conclusions in the matter, with some references to the facts and the law.

The question as originally presented in this case by the bill Thomas Purcell filed originally, was the right of the railroad company to hold his coal, claiming a lien thereon for charges on former shipments and for acclaim of a balance due for construction of side-tracks…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Stone & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Gage v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Miller v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API