Legal Opinion
ARUANNO v. JOHNSON
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 22, 2020No. 2:14-cv-01954Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOSEPH ARUANNO, Civ. No. 2:14-1954 (WJM) Plaintiff, OPINION v. STEVEN JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.: THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark Falk, to which Plaintiff objects. ECF No. 102 & 104. Defendants Steven Johnson and Gary Lanigan filed a motion to dismiss for failure to comply with a discovery order. ECF No. 96. Plaintiff filed an opposition. ECF No. 98. Judge Falk issued a Report and Recommendation, which, for the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mindek v. RigattiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Hicks v. FeeneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.