McArthur v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
After a jury trial, Quentin McArthur was convicted of DUI. He now appeals on the grounds that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress the results of his breath test and that the court erred when it charged the jury on expert opinion testimony. We find no error and affirm.
Where, as here, the evidence at a hearing on a motion to suppress is uncontroverted and no question of credibility is presented, we review the trial court’s application of the law to undisputed facts de novo. Vansant v. State, 264 Ga. 319, 320 (1) (443 SE2d 474) (1994). Where there is evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Lindley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Werner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Butts v. City of Peachtree CityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999