Richardson v. State

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Che Joseph Richardson guilty of armed robbery. The trial court denied his motion for new trial, in which he claimed, among other things, ineffective assistance of counsel. Richardson appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He also argues that the trial court committed a charging error and improperly failed to hold a Jackson-Denno 1 hearing. Finally, he asserts that trial counsel’s ineffectiveness demands reversal. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we construe the evidence in the light most…