People v. Mulder
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from his jury trial conviction of embezzlement. MCL 750.174; MSA 28.371. We affirm.
On appeal defendant claims he was improperly bound over on the charge of embezzlement either because the prosecution failed to prove proper venue or because there were insufficient facts presented at the preliminary examination to support a charge of embezzlement.
The preliminary examination testimony indicates that Gretchen Englehart owned a business known as Oak Concepts, which employed defendant as a full-time commissioned salesman. The business encompassed the purchase of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BergmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003