Legal Opinion

Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. CIR

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-1381Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-1381 ___________ Nestlé Purina Petcare Co., * * Petitioner-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * * Respondent-Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: December 15, 2009 Filed: February 9, 2010 ___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ BENTON, Circuit Judge. The tax court ruled, on summary judgment, that Nestlé Purina Petcare Company — hereafter Ralston, its name during the relevant years — could not deduct payments for cash…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API