Roberts v. New York City Office of Collective Bargaining
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richter, J.
This appeal raises the question of whether the New York City Fire Department’s “zero tolerance” policy, requiring automatic termination of certain emergency medical services (EMS) employees who fail or refuse to provide a specimen for a drug test, should have been subject to mandatory collective bargaining. The New York City Board of Collective Bargaining (the Board) found that this issue was not required to be bargained, and unions representing the employees brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We now uphold the Board’s decision because the New York City…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Khan v. New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Watertown v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Levitt v. Board of CollectiveNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.