Legal Opinion · Dissent
Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee v. Oregon Public Employes' Retirement Board
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1984No. Agency Nos. OAR 459-30-015; OAR 459-30-025; OAR 459-10-040; SC 30239; CA A23477PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1DissentLinde, J.
Oregon law entitles police officers and fire fighters to retirement benefits under the Public Employes’ Retirement System unless the public employer provides retirement benefits “which are equal to or better than the benefits which would be provided to them under the system, as determined... by the Public Employes’ Retirement Board.” ORS 237.620(4). Petitioners, the Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee, seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that sustained the validity of certain rules of the board (PERB) interpreting this statutory requirement.
Petitioner’s main challenge is to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee v. Oregon Public Employes' Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trebesch v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Kilham Stationery & Printing v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Salem Firefighters Local 314 v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Salem Firefighters Local 314 v. Public Employes Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Meister v. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.