Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Chimento

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The record reveals that claimant left her job as a chiropractic assistant because there was too much responsibility which caused her stress. First, we note that claimant’s weekend work schedule was entirely up to her and, therefore, she did not have to work seven days to complete her job duties. In addition, while claimant alleged that there were…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. In re the Claim of RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API