Legal Opinion

In re Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

This application to stay arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement presents a somewhat unusual phase. The proposed arbitration concerns the termination by the petitioner of the employment of one of its agents. .The union asserts that the termination was not justified. The agreement provides for arbitration of such a dispute but limits the scope of the arbitration. The applicable clause is: “ In arbitrating such grievance, the arbitrator shall determine only whether or not the facts alleged by the Company, or any other facts presented, justified such action. Should the arbitrator…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. BrunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Rice Holman v. United Elec., R. M.W., AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Ehrhart & Associates, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Ehrhart & Associates, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API