Legal Opinion
Rochon v. Preferred Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 16, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
This action is brought under General Statutes, § 4231, by which, if the defendant in an action to recover for personal injuries is insured against loss from such liability, the judgment creditor is subrogated to the rights of the assured against his insurer. The complaint alleged that, in consideration of a premium paid by Fred A. Spencer and Josephine A. Spencer, the defendant issued its policy insuring them against loss by reason of injury to any person caused by the automobile mentioned in the policy, in accordance with its terms; that on and prior to December 21st, 1929, Spencer entrusted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Seltzer v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Guerin v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by19 opinions
- Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- COMMERCIAL CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Brown v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Munroe v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Arton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.