Legal Opinion

Bhattacharya v. SUNY Rockland Cmty. Coll.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 10, 2017No. 17-1048-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17‐1048‐cv Bhattacharya v. SUNY Rockland Cmty. Coll., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Stanton v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Weintraub v. Board of Educ. of City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API