Minneapolis Selling Co. v. R. N. Cowin & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Blaclchawh District Court. — Hon. F. C. Platt, Judge. Action at law to recover the selling price of a quantity of post cards. There was trial to a jury, and at the conclusion of the testimony the court upon plaintiff’s motion directed a verdict in their favor. From the judgment entered upon this verdict the defendants have appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
At the date of the transaction out of which this litigation has arisen, the defendants were proprietors of a news stand in the city of Waterloo, Iowa, and plaintiffs were manufacturers and jobbers of post cards at Minneapolis, Minn. On May 3 and 4, 1907, plaintiffs’ traveling representative called upon defendants and solicited their order for cards. On the day first mentioned defendants gave the solicitor an order for certain Christmas .goods amounting to $62.70, over which, as we understand the record, there is no controversy. On the following day defendants gave him another order for 30,000…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Upton Manuf'g Co. v. HuiskeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Hirshhorn & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Wright & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Allison v. VaughanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Fruit Product Co. v. Davenport Vinegar & Pickling WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Latham v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- W. H. Hoopes & Sons v. F. H. Simpson Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Wrot Iron Heater Co. v. Sanders Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954