In re Kent

OPINION OF THE COURT

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with two allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained both charges. The petitioner now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent has submitted an affidavit concurring in the findings of the Special Referee and requesting that his suspension from the practice of law since August 7, 1989, be deemed sufficient sanction for his misconduct.

Charge One alleged that the respondent failed to keep his registration with the Office of Court Administration current, as required by Judiciary…