Legal Opinion
Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 6, 2022No. 3:18-cv-00939Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 CYNTEC COMPANY, LTD., Case No. 18-cv-00939-PJH 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS 9 CHILISIN ELECTRONICS CORP., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 285, 286, 288, 294 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 Before the court are the post-trial motions filed by the parties in the above- 15 captioned case. Defendants Chilisin Electronics Corp. and Chilisin America Ltd. 16 (collectively “Chilisin”) filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 17 50(b) (Dkt. 285) and a motion for a new trial under Rule 59 (Dkt. 286).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.