Artkraft Strauss Sign Corp. v. Dimeling
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HESTER, Judge:
Myron Levin appeals from the June 16, 1992 judgment 1 entered by the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas following the denial of post-trial motions. Sitting as the factfinder, the court ordered appellant to pay Classic Outdoor Advertising Co. (“Classic”) the sum of $80,000 and The Artkraft Strauss Sign Corporation (“Artkraft”) the sum of $7,500. Appellant argues that the trial court committed numerous errors. We affirm.
The record, viewed in the light most favorable to appellees as verdict winners, reveals the following. Appellant was an experienced commission salesman for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Cardamone v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Loyal Christian Benefit Ass'n v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Keystone Filler & Mfg. Co. v. American Mining InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Fleetway Leasing Co. v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pressley v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pressley v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003