Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 2007No. 3D05-2845Published

1Concurrence

*609CORTIÑAS, Judge

(concurring).

I concur entirely but write only to highlight the fundamental and legally significant difference between aesthetic regulations aimed at commercial and/or recreational vehicles11 and those aimed at personal use mainstream vehicles. While commercial and recreational vehicles have been the subject of judicially-upheld regulations based on aesthetic considerations, personal use mainstream vehicles have not.

Personal use mainstream vehicles include cars, station wagons, minivans, sport-utility vehicles (“SUVs”), and light trucks. Record evidence shows that the category…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Coral Gables v. WoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Henley v. City of Cape CoralDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. City of Nichols Hills v. RichardsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Proctor v. City of Coral SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. City of Blue Springs v. GregoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API