Legal Opinion

Millett v. Maine Central Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 12, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

Action by an employee to recover damages for personal injuries. Compulsory nonsuit imposed. Exception taken.

One count is at common law. Two others declare somewhat differently against an employer nonassenting to the Workman’s *315Compensation Act, R. S., Chap. 50, as amended by 1919 Laws, Chap. 238.

Each count alleges that the method of keeping the right of way, or location, of the defendant railroad free from grass, by burning it, was actionably negligent as to the plaintiff, to the injury of one of his eyes from the lodgment of a spark.

Plea, general issue. Brief statement sets up interstate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mad River & Lake Erie Railroad v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Myers v. W. C. DePauw Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. BerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  2. Smith v. DrinkwaterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API