Legal Opinion

Wu v. Good

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1986No. 84CA0098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

In this forcible entry and detainer (F.E.D.) action, defendants, Robert and Mary Good (buyers), appeal from the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of certain real property and damages, to plaintiffs, Paul and Susan Wu (sellers). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In April of 1980, buyers and sellers entered into an installment land contract for the purchase and sale of an apartment building, buyers paying sellers $50,000 as down payment toward the full purchase price of $390,000. The contract provided that buyers pay $2,954 monthly to be applied to the balance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodco v. LindahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. American Mortgage Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Barlow v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. Merkowitz v. MahoneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  5. Rubel-Jones Agency, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grombone v. KrekelColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Paraguay Place-View Trust v. GrayColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Renco Associates v. D'Lance, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Steinhoff v. FischColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Teem PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API