Raphiel v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
By the WHOLE COURT as then constituted. O’NIELL, J.
Plaintiff, appellee, has moved to dismiss this appeal because the testimony, on which the judgment by default was confirmed, was not reduced to writing. He contends that articles 602 and 603 of the Code of Practice, requiring the district judge, under certain circumstances, to furnish a statement of facts upon which the judgment was rendered, do not apply to a case where the judgment went by default, and the testimony was not required to be reduced to writing.
We are not referred to any ruling in support of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fletcher v. Ozone Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lamb v. LambSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Succession of Rock v. Allstate Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- De Frances v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Piper v. Olinde Hardware & Supply Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Frederick v. Popich Marine Construction, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.