Legal Opinion

Iaquinto v. Notarfrancesco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1937No. Appeal, 212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This was an action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in entering the automobile of defendant. The case was tried before the court and a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $500. Binding instructions for defendant were refused and motion for judgment non obstante veredicto overruled in an opinion by Alessandroni, J. This appeal followed.

The facts are correctly stated in the opinion of the court below from which we quote as follows: “The testimony discloses that the plaintiff was visiting the home of a Mend…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christ v. Hill Metal & Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Ford v. ReinoehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Cole v. CorioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brosnan's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Rivera Matos v. AmadorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
  3. Patterson v. MoffittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Hinkson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Rivera Matos v. AmadorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API