Legal Opinion

Kamerman v. Kolt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1994PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to , recover damages for libel, the plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered July 8,1993, as granted the separate motions of the defendants Michael Reich and Paul Hoffert for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them, (2) so much of a judgment of the same court, entered September 20, 1993, as is in favor of the defendants Michael Reich and Paul Hoffert and against him, dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against those defendants, and (3) an order of the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hollander v. CaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Garson v. HendlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Thai v. Cayre Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Golden v. StisoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Phelan v. Huntington Tri-Village Little League, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Cooper v. HodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API