Legal Opinion
Smith v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
On the 16th day of August, 1938, an order was made in the above-entitled action pursuant to section 170 of the General Corporation Law, as follows:
“ Ordered, that Guaranty Trust Company of New York, by W. Palen Conway, its President, and Purcell Robertson, its Secretary, and by such of its other officers or employees who has or have knowledge of its transactions with the defendant herein prior and/or subsequent to the year 1917, appear at Special Term of this Court to be held in the County Court House in the County of Albany on the 19th day of August, 1938, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Smith v. . RentzNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Foster v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Schwickert v. LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- P. V. Baranowsky Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughan v. BroadfootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In re R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1987