Legal Opinion

State v. Lamont Donnell Sholar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2018No. 2016AP000897-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRebecca Grassl Bradley, J.

*566¶ 1 Lamont Donnell Sholar seeks review of the court of appeals decision1 affirming the circuit court's2 order ruling that his trial counsel's failure to object to an exhibit sent to the jury during deliberations constituted ineffective assistance only with respect to one of the six counts for *567which he was convicted. He contends that his trial counsel's ineffective assistance should result in vacatur of all six of his convictions. He also asserts the State forfeited its right to argue the prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance test at his Machner hearing because the State did not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Security Finance v. Brian KirschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. Carrie E. CounihanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Theophilous RuffinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. George E. SavageWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API