Legal Opinion

E. S. Preston Associates, Inc. v. Preston

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1986No. 85-1354PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

This court is now asked to review the construction by the lower courts of the various contracts executed by appellant and appellee. It is well-settled that contracts must be given a just and reasonable construction in order to carry out the presumed intent of the parties. Ger*10mania Fire Ins. Co. v. Schild (1903), 69 Ohio St. 136, 139-140; First Natl. Bank of Van Wert v. Houtzer (1917), 96 Ohio St. 404.

The first issue for our consideration involves appellant’s liability on the promissory note in which he promised to pay, on demand, the cash value of the insurance policies plus any amounts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Jonas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. North v. Higbee Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Miles v. Kohli & Kaliher Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Leroux's Billyle Supper Club v. MaOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Wurth v. Ideal Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Buckeye Union Insurance v. Consolidated Stores Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API