Legal Opinion

Haines v. Thompson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1906No. Gen. No. 12,585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action of assumpsit. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Homer Abbott, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1906.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have considered the points relied on by the plaintiff in error, and find no merit in any one of them.

The first position .taken by him is that the rule of the Circuit Court providing that “no case shall be noticed for trial (on the short cause calendar) until the same is at issue, ’ ’ was violated in this case, and that as this rule is shown in the record in an affidavit offered in support of the motion for a new trial, 'we should take notice thereof, and hold that the new trial was improperly refused.

It is not necessary for us…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cogshall v. BeesleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Armstrong v. CrillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Thompson v. SornbergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Griesheimer v. MeyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API