Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A. v. Unisys Finance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1996No. A96A0027, A96A0028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Unisys Finance Corporation (“Unisys”) obtained a judgment against Hanover Credit Corporation (“Hanover”). To satisfy its judgment, Unisys filed a garnishment, naming Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A., (‘Wachovia”) as garnishee. Although Hanover maintained 17 accounts with Wachovia, Wachovia determined that 15 of the accounts were “trust accounts” and not subject to the garnishment. Accordingly, Wachovia answered the garnishment stating that money found in one of the two remaining accounts was subject to the garnishment. Unisys traversed the answer stating it was untrue. The trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wt Harvey Lumber Company v. Jm Wells Lumber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Travelers Insurance v. Trans State, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Oxford v. Metter Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Spivey v. Methodist Home of South Georgia Conference, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. C. & S. NAT. BANK v. Avco Fin. Serv., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. M. Buckler & Associates, Inc. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Akridge v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Shubert v. Murray (In re Shubert)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015
  4. Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A. v. Unisys Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API