Tate v. McGraw
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LOONEY, Justice.
The disposition made of the case does not require any statement to be made of the pleadings, other than to say that the action involves the title to 17 acres of land, the issue as to ownership was tendered by each party, McGraw sought recovery in a formal action of trespass to try title, and Tate, in same manner, sought recovery in a cross-action. McGraw claims through a sheriff’s deed under a default judgment in favor of the state against Tate in a tax suit, and, unless he was thus divested of title, the court erred in rendering judgment against him.
The land .was the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cline v. NibloTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Higgins v. BordagesTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Harrison v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Brown v. BonougliTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Wright v. StraubTexas Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kubena v. HatchTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Newman v. City of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Hatch v. KubenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Tate v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934