Legal Opinion

Neal v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1990No. A89A2289PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

This is a negligence action arising from a collision between a bicycle ridden by plaintiff Neal and an automobile operated by defendant Miller. Plaintiff appeals from a directed verdict in favor of defendant. Held:

“ ‘ “A directed verdict is proper only where there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced together with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict. OCGA § 9-11-50 (a).” (Cit.)’ Dependable Equip. &c. Co. v. Nursecare of Atlanta, 184 Ga. App. 136, 137 (361 SE2d 23) (1987).”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Conyers Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Collins v. Ralston & Ogletree, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Clayton v. LariseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Dependable Equipment & Leasing Co. v. Nursecare of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Kicklighter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Purvis v. SteveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Hogan v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Steinberg v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API