Legal Opinion
Koretoff v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1558 (ESH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, California almond growers and grower-retailers, brought suit against the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to challenge a USDA regulation requiring almond handlers to treat raw almonds in order to reduce the risk of Salmonella bacteria contamination. 1 In a Memorandum Opinion issued on March 9, 2009, the Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. Koretoff v. Vilsack, 601 F.Supp.2d 238 (D.D.C.2009). Four grower-retailers have now moved, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- (PS) Weston v. WIP 800 J LoftsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Lopez v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021