Legal Opinion
Dial Manufacturing International, Inc. v. McGraw-Edison Co. International
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 25, 1987No. CIV 82-634 PHX CLHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARDY, District Judge.
Dial applied for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-2314A. Arguing that it was completely successful, Dial sought to recover the fees incurred in asserting all of its claims in this action. After Dial attempted to commence discovery, McGraw-Edison moved for protective relief. On January 8, 1987, the parties were directed to suspend all discovery pending the resolution of two legal issues: (1) whether Dial’s antitrust claims bore any relation to the state racketeering claim and (2) what expenditures by Dial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Shannon v. Pay 'N Save Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grossinger Motorcorp, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Brown v. Real Estate Resource Management, LLC (In Re Polo Builders Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Dial Manufacturing-International, Inc. v. McGraw Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987