Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Offill

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1929No. Docket No. 6347PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, J., pro tem.

A purported will of Mathias Walter Offill, deceased, was offered for probate under petition of E. Louise Bell, for. letters with the will annexed. Addie 0. Freeman, a daughter of deceased, contested the probate thereof on a number of separate grounds. Only three of the grounds of contest need be noticed herein, and they put in issue the points covered by the following references and quotations from the court’s findings.

After hearing without a jury the court found that neither of the alleged witnesses “signed said purported will as attesting witnesses or witnesses in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Albright v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Camperi v. ChiechiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. In Re Estate of KavcicDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Estate of MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Estate of TracyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API