Legal Opinion

Rockhold v. Rockhold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

A preliminary question has arisen upon the application of the plaintiff in error for >an allowance of alimony in this case to enable her to prosecute her proceeding in error. It is claimed for this motion that under §11994 GC provision is made for the allowance of alimony by the Court of Appeals when an appeal is taken from the trial court to the Court of Appeals. It is claimed that the word appeal in the last sentence of §11994 is used in a generic sense and ought to be given an interpretation that would include both proceedings on appeal and proceedings in error, and that when…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beach v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Davis v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Dann v. DannOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Schiff v. SchiffOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API