Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte University of South Alabama

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 27, 1989No. 87-1353Published

1Dissent

When children have children, out of wedlock, it presents tremendous social problems.1 This case presents one of those problems, viz., who should pay for an unwed minor's expenses of pregnancy and confinement? The majority, finding that the expenses were "necessary," holds that the father of the unwed minor mother must pay for them. I cannot accept this as being either the legal, or the equitable, solution to the problem.

In my opinion, because these expenses were incurred by the unwed minor mother during her confinement for the delivery of an illegitimate child, the law applicable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BurksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Madison General Hospital v. HaackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ex Parte OdemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API