Legal Opinion
Sabharwal v. Eminax, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 29, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Kornreich, J.), entered April 15, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment as against defendants Eminax, LLC and Emiko Kothari, and order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered April 16, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Plaintiffs contention that defendants Eminax and Emiko Kothari were not parties to the defense motion to dismiss the complaint and thus defaulted in meeting their obligation to file a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Snediker v. Rockefeller Center Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Joseph Stevens & Co., L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- McCoy v. Edison Price, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kavanagh v. VigarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- RCM Tech. Inc. v. Maric Mech., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- RCM Tech. Inc. v. Maric Mech., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- D'Esposito v. Gusrae, Kaplan & Bruno PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007