State v. Edmonds
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the trial court erred in signing and entering the second judgment and commitment without specifically vacating or striking the prior judgment duly signed and entered at the same session (term). We hold that the court .did not err.
Defendant recognizes, and authorities support, the principle that during a session of the court a judgment is in fieri and the court has authority in its sound discretion, prior to expiration of the session, to modify, amend or set aside the judgment. 5 Strong’s N. C. Index 2d, Judgments, § 6, pp. 14-15;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiggins v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Chriscoe v. ChriscoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In Re MosesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. QuickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. SammartinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. MeadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.