Itek Corporation v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WOLCOTT, Chief Justice:
These are appeals from judgments entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants, Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc. and Bourns, Inc. The actions are for breach of contract by C.A.I. and for tor-tious interference by Bourns, Inc. with negotiations between Itek and C.A.I. for the acquisition by Itek of C.A.I.’s business and assets.
This is the second appeal in this controversy. In the first appeal we reversed a summary judgment for C.A.I. by reason of the existence of unresolved material issues of fact. We held that whether or not a binding agreement had been reached…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Itek Corporation v. Chicago Aerial Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Isaak v. JourneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Anchor Motor Freight v. CiabattoniSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Enrique v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- State v. Anthony R. PicoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Kuczynski v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Delaware · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.